Antitrust Concerns are Reportedly Escalating with the DOJ's Investigation of Google Maps

According to Politico and Trade Algo on Wednesday, the Department of Justice has refocused on Google Maps as part of its already extensive antitrust investigation into the firm.

‍

The outlets stated, citing anonymous individuals, that the DOJ is focusing on whether Google unlawfully bundles its maps and search products by requiring app developers to utilize them together. The DOJ is reportedly looking into how Google bundles its maps, app store, and voice assistant for manufacturers through Google Automotive Services, according to Politico.

‍

According to Trade Algo the Department was investigating bundling Google Maps in March of last year. But, according to Politico and Bloomberg, the DOJ has reportedly started re-interviewing prospective witnesses, including rivals and clients, in recent weeks. This suggests that the investigation may be moving more quickly.

‍

Politico stated that a lawsuit might be filed as early as this year, despite sources telling the publication that no decision has been taken over whether to do so.

‍

Two antitrust lawsuits have already been brought by the DOJ against Google: one in 2020 that targets the distribution of Google's search product and one this month that focuses on its online advertising business.

‍

A number of lawsuits brought against Google by associations of state attorneys general are likewise centered on concerns related to the Google Play app store and the DOJ cases.

‍

Developers are "allowed to use other mapping services in addition to Google Maps Platform - and many do," a Google spokeswoman stated in a statement.

‍

The official noted that Google doesn't have to offer its automotive services to automakers using its Android Automotive OS because there is "enormous competition in the connected car industry."

‍

The representative stated, "We always cooperate with regulators and are happy to address any concerns they may have regarding our business.

‍

A representative for the DOJ declined to respond.